Um, any confirmation of these “Secret meeting with interest group to discuss policy” that you say are no different from the Vice President’s secret meetings?

Or are you going to just spread rumors and then attack DNREC with “just like Cheney” nonsense?

I heard that DNREC is going to be giving out secret decoder rings with Capt’n Crunch pictures on them, only the captain looks like Markell. This is going to happen at Boston Market on 202 at 2:30 on November 31st. Maybe you should check that out.

He’s not talking about Copeland’s radio comments. There were no radio comments. He’s likening Copeland to Rick Jensen in a negative light, but even then, you can note the word “blogosphere” in the statement.

I know you’re always looking for something to obfuscate the obvious in order to distract from the matter at hand. But in this case, it ain’t there.

So if you want to judge whether Kowalko’s letter was a proper response, or an “attack” – you would need the audio.

Do I need to use smaller words, or bigger links?

Copeland writes post.
Kowalko writes post criticizing Copeland.

I never mentioned the radio, you did. And how much more primary can you get than Kowalko’s own words in print?

I’ll wait for the audio rather than rely on your characterization of it. Primary sources, remember?

No difference. Secret meeting with interest group to discuss policy.

The “lick of difference” is that Cheney would not even reveal who he had meetings with.

That is more than a “lick.” That is more like a huge gulp of difference.

Reading the two posts, I still think Kowalko’s focus on Charlie was inappropriate, and his complete bashing of a major employer will I’m sure go over well with any other out-of-state company that would bring jobs here. Elected officials calling companies ‘carpetbaggers,’ regardless of their sins, is a great way to ensure that those jobs never get replaced.